Memorandum of Understanding and Contract: Major Differences that every Indian Business must know
Partnerships, joint venture, arrangements with vendors, and investment talks in the Indian business environment collaterally take the form of a mou agreement. Nevertheless, a lot of entrepreneurs mix Memorandum of Agreement and a binding mou contract that results in legal misunderstanding and financial losses. The distinction between a preliminary legal memo of understanding and a legally binding contract is a fact that is critical to protect the interests of the business.
As an entrepreneur, corporate officer, or investor, the difference between employing a mou agreement and signing a formal memorandum of agreement can be a matter of the strongest legal framework of your business deal.
What Is a Memorandum of Understanding?
Legal memorandum of understanding is normally a preparatory document, which reflects the desire of parties to cooperate. When making an agreed contract, a mou agreement is usually a document that documents an agreement of understanding, offers and commercial conditions, prior to the signing of a detailed contract.
Businesses often enter into a mou contract in order to show commitment during the negotiation. Not all memorandums of agreement are however legally binding. Its enforceability will rely on the language applied, intent of parties and the application of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
A well-written legal memorandum of understanding makes the difference between the arrangement being binding and only indicative. As such, companies should consider the fact that a mou contract does not necessarily bind itself as long as it complies with some critical legal requirements.
What Is a Contract?
A contract, as opposed to a general mou agreement is a legally binding contract that fulfills offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention to form legal relationships. Whereas a memorandum of agreement is a recording of intentions, a contract is binding.
In some cases, the parties make a reference to a mou contract. A document which satisfies the statutory requirements becomes legally enforceable as a contract. The legal memorandum of understanding can be structured in such a way that it is binding when its obligations and legal implications are clearly drawn. In commercial practices, however, in the majority of cases, the detailed agreement between businesses is made upon signing an initial mou agreement.
The point of difference is that of enforceability. A contract provides a legal redress but a loosely written memorandum of agreement can provide mutual understanding but not a very strong enforceable agreement in the courts.
See also: How Professional Artificial Grass Contractors Transform Your Lawn
Key Difference
a. The legality of Enforcement
Enforceability is the most significant difference between a mou agreement and a contract. Legal memorandum of understanding can or cannot be binding depending on how it is worded. Indian courts look into the question of whether there was clear intention to enter into contractual obligations in the mou contract.
A formal contract on the other hand is automatically binding as long as it satisfies statutory requirements. A draft memorandum of agreement containing binding clauses, dispute resolution provisions and terms of consideration may be treated as a contract. Nevertheless, an uncertain mou agreement can be invalid in court as it is not certain.
b. Purpose and Stage of Execution
A mou agreement is an agreement that is normally signed during the negotiation phase in order to detail the proposed cooperation. Before undertaking due diligence of the business or concluding terms of investment, businesses usually sign a memorandum of agreement.
However, a contract is signed when all the negotiations are finished. A mou contract may become a stepping point on the way to a full-fledged agreement. A Legal Memorandum of Understanding can be used to establish confidentiality, exclusivity and preliminary obligations when well written without forming complete contractual liability.
Therefore, the intent and timing is a glaring distinction between a mou agreement and a final binding contract.
c. Level of Detail
Memorandum of agreement is not as detailed as a contract normally is. The terms of a mou agreement are expressions of general commercial knowledge and not the comprehensive law.
On the contrary, a contract has specific provisions on payment, indemnity, limitation of liability, intellectual property, dispute resolution and termination. In case a legal memorandum of understanding includes these specific clauses and consideration, it can legally be a mou contract, which can be considered contractually binding by the courts.
Thus, the legal weight of the mou agreement depends on its construction and content.
d. Flexibility and Exit Options
Mou agreement offers flexibility to retreat in the case of failure in negotiations particularly in situations where it is expressly given out to be non-binding. Through a memorandum of agreement, the parties may be able to see how they can collaborate without exposing themselves to legal liability.
A contract is however binding with strong consequences in case of breach. A legal memorandum of understanding may become a binding mou contract in case there are penalty provisions or conditions of obligatory performance in it.
Mou agreement should be strictly written by businesses in order to avoid unintentional liabilities in the course of initial agreements.
Under What Circumstances Indian Businesses need an MOU?
Mou agreement is applicable in joint venture, strategic alliance, government agreements and initial stage investment talks. To facilitate the parties in recording common objectives, a memorandum of agreement may be used to pave the way to an elaborate contract.
Businesses however should make sure the legal memorandum of understanding is clear on whether it is a binding or non-binding agreement. Most business conflicts occur due to the casual way parties interpret a mou contract without being aware of the legal consequences of such a contract.
When it comes to litigation, a professionally written mou agreement makes it clear and minimizes the litigation risk.
When Is a Formal Contract Necessary?
Contracts are required in cases of financial dealings, transfer of intellectual property, service provision, or obligations that are long term in nature. Although a memorandum of agreement can be used to start discussions, a detailed agreement offers effective solutions which can be enforced in the instance of breach.
Legal memorandum of understanding should include crucial elements of a contract in case it is supposed to be legally binding. Otherwise, companies ought to move out of a mou agreement to a full-fledged contract prior to starting business.
Relating a mou contract to a full agreement can put companies at risk of facing high legal uncertainty.
Conclusion
The distinction between a mou agreement and a formal contract is very important to the Indian businesses. A memorandum of agreement is a rough outline which a contract establishes enforceable responsibilities. The legal existence of a mou contract will be determined by how it is drafted and how the parties intend.
An effective legal memorandum of understanding would secure interests in negotiations but never a detailed contract in place where a lot of rights and liabilities are involved.
The most important aspect of any Indian business is to prepare the mou agreement with clarity, precision and legal foresight in order to have the relationships between the commercial business secure and free of conflice.
